AnotherWorthlessBlog I Support NoCleanFeed

10Dec/090

Why I don’t like the new fire ratings…

So after Black Saturday fire authorities around this country where pressured into doing something. Something the community would notice, and something that would have an impact. So it appears that born out of this requirement is the new fire danger rating.

It used to be that we had a simple to understand fire rating system

  • Extreme
  • Severe
  • Very High
  • High
  • Low - Moderate

Basically all the new one does is add "Code Red". What does that even mean, it's worse than severe but so what. What does a severe rating even mean. All the ratings do is rate how controllable a fire will be should it be ignited on the day. To me, even as a CFA volunteer, "Code Red" means nothing. It just means the FDI (fire danger indicator) has gone above a certain number and that if there's a fire it's likely to turn nasty. I wouldn't do anything different on a "Code Red" day than I would on an extreme day.

Of course now that I'm in the city this is all pretty meaningless to me ATM but I hope to help out with fires if there are any around Wangaratta this year.

We don't need a more complicated fire danger system.

What we do need (which has now been deployed) is an emergency alert system. (http://www.emergencyalert.gov.au/)

The system can call landlines in a specific area or txt mobiles based on their billing address. I'm still not happy that you can't txt based on a physical location derived from the connected cell towers, but the new system appears to be better than nothing.

But the problem still is, how do these alerts get issued.

And from visiting the website I notice that the same problem still remains. All of the different agencies have their own warnings (primarily CFA/DSE) and they have them on their own sites.

What we need to do is create a singular portal for each state for fire information. The agencies need to pull together and actually give us information available in one place. I also notice the CFA itself STILL doesn't display the fire danger levels on their site. The word was this was because of some disagreement between the CFA and the BOM (Bureau Of Meteorology) over how to set the fire danger. So the CFA just links to the BOM site and you still have to go there for the information.

How hard is it for the government to aggregate this information into one place, the things such a site could do would be limitless:

  • Reports from fire officers in your area
  • SMS alert sign up to get fire danger warnings
  • A single alerting portal that shows all current incidents and any warnings associated with them

And the whole thing could have a sign up system that allowed the user to view a portal that was just for them.

But no, what did our government do, it just made another fire danger warning level. "Code Red" IMHO is a waste of money. There have already been  a couple of "Code Red" days which seemed pretty non "Code Red" to me...

So anyway that's my rant... Started a month ago and finished today because I was a little more bored than usual...

17Mar/090

News Response :: Power firm faces legal action over bushfires

Unless you've been living under a rock recently (or possibly in a country other than Australia) you'll know about the bushfires that recently caused so many deaths in Victoria. Some of the fires (definately the ones near Beechworth) where started by powerlines across the state, and, something that's not mentioned in this article, is that many more smaller fires have been started over the past couple of months by power infrastructure. The fact is the extreme heat, coupled with the high loads being handled by power infrastructure today, is putting an enormous strain on our power infrastructure. Today people want huge TV's, computers, gaming consoles and all of this is resulting on an increased load on our power systems. The power companies I'm sure are upgrading lines and supply services as quickly as is efficient but it does seem that current systems are starting to fail under the pressure.

But the main issue of late seems to be the heat, which brings with it alot of problems, particularly relating to cables expanding and contracting with temparature changes. While the heat has subsided now it's important to remember at the time alot of issues where seen, including the issues with trains not being able to run. The heat and strange wind conditions probably caused the fire at Beechworth (I'm not commenting on the one in the article because I don't have firsthand knowledge) and it simply could not be contained because of the weather conditions.

But I've gone on long enough, on to the article. It talks about a moronic group of bloodsucking lawyers (no offence meant to any lawyers out there, except the ones in the article) taking on the company that manages the power infrastructure that may have started the fires near Horsham. For one thing, this is jumping the gun because the cause hasn't been established, but secondly, what good is this supposed to bring. It'll be legal battle that will cost both sides heavily and only result in the power company having less money to maintain a network that obviously needs attention.

So this court case will do nothing except take money away from the companies that did incredibly well under harsh conditions to restore power. I'm disturbed that anyone would be so stupid and damn short sighted as to encourage this case, but it seems they are. It's court cases like these that add infinite amounts of red tape to everything and make it harder for things to get done. But hey, that's not important, all the lawyers in this case care about is the money.

The fact is, even if the power lines started the fire, what right do people have to claim money from them? IMHO none... Not an ounce... Fires are often started by faulty electrical equipment, but obviously these people seem to think that ANY faulty equipment is unnaceptable which means that power companies will have to shut down power more often to ensure that such things don't occur again, and yet they still will. These fires happen all the time, a possom gets fried by lines somehow and some sparks hit the ground, the heat causes earthing cables to warp an then they break causing sparks, and usually the CFA is on hand to secure the incident before it gets serious.

The fact is the weather was so shocking there is nothing that could be done to prevent the fire getting large enough to be unmanageable. People need to accept that these fires happened, stop trying place blame (except in the case of arson) and rebuild their lives. Cases like this do nothing for anyone in the long or short term, eventually the people may get some small settlement, or they may not, in the long run everyone looses.

Except the lawyers, I'm sure they'll sue again when the milk in their office goes off because the power company had to cut power to do complex checks to ensure their lines are still safe... And I'm sure they would to...

Article Source - http://www.theage.com.au/national/power-firm-faces-legal-action-over-bushfires-20090313-8xj2.html

31Jan/090

Who's to blame…

Seems to be the game everyones playing recently, who's to blame for the power outages, who's to blame for the public transport delays, blah blah blah... Lets start with public transport, because most people seem to be talking about that lately!

Don't get me wrong, I hate Connex as much as the rest of you. Between those jerks with the badges around there necks walking around like they're all powerfull, the seemingly random delays, and not to mention that when the shit hits the fan and they do switch to buses, half the time the drivers don't know where to go! Even if they do the buses are always so loaded it feels like the damn thing is going to roll every time. It's amazing how many people Connex will jam into those damn things... So yes, I hate Connex just as much as you! But to blame them for the issues that have occured over the last few days, well, it's easy to blame them I suppose, because if you don't blame them who do you blame...

Let's face it people, it's been EXTREMELY hot the last few days, and what happens to stuff when it gets far hotter than it was designed to get, it breaks. Just like the tracks. The fact is that with todays technology the railway tracks will ALWAYS warp under extreme heat. Unless you people want to pay 50 bucks for a zone 1 2 hour and then maybe they can water cool the damn things. But the fact is, you don't, and you wouldn't, so you have to put up with it when they do warp, and, when they do, the trains obviously can't run on them. Not to mention the power problems that occured yesterday, that's not their fault either, nor is it anyone elses, it's just the heat people.

Of course there are the usual horror stories about replacement buses, and those shouldn't happen, but lets face it (this is strongly pointed in the Victorian Opposition and in the Victorian Media's direction) NOBODY IS TO BLAME. It's just one of those things people.

I suppose I've kind of covered the power already and it's much the same. It's not the governments fault that our power is out, for those of you that don't have power. The fact is, it's too hot, and  things have started to fail, get over it and get on with your lives. Also, to whichever news channel said that some poor little baby was turned away from a hospital for heat exhaustion. I'm sorry, if it had have been serious you wouldn't have been turned away. Not to mention, these places have backup power so their operation would not have been impeded to the point where a dying baby was turned away. And if the baby wasn't dying, just a little hot... I dunno... How about you GO HOME AND GIVE HIM A NICE COOL BATH!!! You live in the city, you still have water you moron...

So people, quit blaming for the public transport and power issues relating to the heat... It's a fact of life... Get over it... You could always live near delburn and have just had your house burnt down. When the power comes back on you'll still have your house... They won't... Oh btw, to those mates who have been blaming, this isn't meant personally... It's just my POV... Anyway I'm off to chew on some ice to try to stay cool...